In his
second German-language film since the Oscar-winning Leben der Anderen, director Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck crafts
a visually stunning and provocative film about the power of art and memory, especially
in the wake of extreme trauma and tragedy. Never
Look Away (German: Werk ohne Autor)
follows thirty years in the life of Kurt Barnert (Tom Schilling), a famed
artist loosely based off of the life of celebrated German artist Gerhard
Richter. Through Kurt’s eyes, we watch some of the most significant historical
moments of the twentieth century in Germany, a scope that only the most gifted
filmmakers could capture.
Beginning the
film in a suburb outside of Dresden, child-Kurt visits a modern art museum with
his aunt, Elizabeth. Regaled by an NS official about how these artists are an
example of actions against the Third Reich, Kurt merely looks at all of the art
with curiosity and a bit of trepidation. Right off the bat: there is an us and a them, only mildly foreshadowing the horror that is to come from World
War II.
The hours concerning
the events during WWII are almost too brutal to watch, but the directing in the
scenes make the emotional impact profound and meaningful. It is also in these
moments that we get the most discussion about not just the injustices in Kurt’s
life, rather in Germany as a whole: the lesser known victims of the Holocaust, and
the incredibly poorly conducted de-Nazification that allowed for high up German
officials to reintegrate into society. This dramatic irony, the audience
knowing what happened to Kurt’s aunt, gives the rest of the film a much-needed tension
that drives the remaining two hours.
The
romance in the film is not necessarily compelling (and I don’t have a degree to
unpack the relationship with his dead aunt), but it certainly heightens the stakes
as the film shifts from a war drama to considering life as an artist in East
Germany. Modern art is no longer the work of enemies of the state, but it is directly
controlled by the state. The juxtaposition between Kurt’s growing love affair
(unknowingly with the daughter of the man who ordered the murder of Kurt’s
aunt) and his need for artistic freedom illustrate to the audience the dissatisfaction
with the DDR that will lead to his inevitable escape into West Germany with his
then wife, also named Elizabeth (Paula Beer).
This is
the point in the film where it goes from being an interesting, albeit brutal, portrayal
of German history, to an insightful discussion of art, life, and beauty in trauma.
Kurt enrolls at the premier art school in Düsseldorf, meeting his eclectic art
teacher, played expertly by the electric Oliver Masucci. The concept of an idea
is compelling, and it suits the character development arc well, but it is the
idea of art as the immortal truth is what creates a true purpose for this film.
Germany is
a country rooted in complex, tragic, and hideous history. Its relationship with
art, and who communicates ideas through art, is deeply rooted in its own
trauma. Creating a film, which is in itself art, to elaborate on the concept of
art itself is an inspired idea on its own. It is in the execution (from the
Oscar-nominated cinematography, the lush and domineering score, and the
direction in general) that the plot becomes something memorable and worth of
celebration.
I think that art is such an interesting scope to view eras of war, and I can't help but think of how this was executed in The Pianist with music. I'm really intrigued by your review of this film and I'll definitely be adding it to my watchlist!
ReplyDelete